Sourdough Crispbread

Name: Sourdough Crispbread
Brand: Peter’s Yard

Peter’s Yard

5060198821363

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Nutrients

–

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5060198820939, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

Milk, rye flour, wheat flour (wheat flour, Calcium, Iron, Thiamin, Niacin), sourdough 12% (rye flour, water), wholemeal wheat flour, honey, salt.

Processing level

No processing group recorded against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5060198820939, is recorded as NOVA 3. That is a different pack, so it is a pointer rather than a reading for this one.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

2.80g

Low

Saturates

1.20g

Low

Sugars

–

No data

Salt

0.00g

Low

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Sourdough Crispbread
5060198820939 NOVA 3
Sourdough Crispbread
5060198820830 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search