White Zinfandel

Unknown brand

5060078183741

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Nutrients

–

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5060078181655, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

23 blossom hill white zinfandel ever wondere sunshine tom this fruity rose with luscious strowbery for hints of water delivering a delic fresh finish ben with friends-and-pem of sizzing comes blossomhill.com juicy & fresh fine 8.5%vol 155 f = eu cairn 5

Processing level

No processing group recorded for this product. That is a gap in the source data rather than a sign the product is unprocessed.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

–

No data

Saturates

Low

Sugars

Low

Salt

–

No data

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

WHITE ZINFANDEL
5060078181655 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Open Food Facts last changed this record on 27 March 2026, and our copy is from 20 August 2026. The source is checked every night, and a product is rewritten here only when its record there changes. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search