Vitamin C 1000mg (Boots)

Unknown brand

5045098597181

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Fat per 100g

92g

High

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5045098597198, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

acid (citric acid), acidity regulator (sodium hydrogen carbonate), vitamin c, maltodextrin, bulking agent (sorbitol), starch, sweetener (sodium cyclamate), hibiscus extract, natural flavourings, colour (beetroot juice powder (maltodextrin, beetroot juice concentrate), sweetener (sodium saccharin).

Processing level

No processing group recorded against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5045098597198, is recorded as NOVA 4. That is a different pack, so it is a pointer rather than a reading for this one.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

92g

High

Saturates

10g

High

Sugars

0.10g

Low

Salt

–

No data

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

vitamin c boots
5045098597198 NOVA 4

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Open Food Facts last changed this record on 16 June 2026, and our copy is from 20 August 2026. The source is checked every night, and a product is rewritten here only when its record there changes. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search