Veggie Cocktail Sausages

Name: Veggie Cocktail Sausages
Brand: Gosh!

Gosh!

5036829756588

Processing

Processed foods

Group 3 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Fat per 100g

13g

Medium

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

Chickpeas¹ (37%), Onion, Rapeseed Oil, Cauliflower (7%), Butter Beans³ (7%), Rice Flour, Potato Flakes, Salt, Parsley, Sage, Thyme, Ground Nutmeg, Ground Coriander, Ground Mace, White Pepper, Black Pepper. (1.23 Origin: EU and non-EU).

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Processing level

NOVA group 3: Processed foods

Foods made by adding salt, sugar or oil to group 1 or 2, such as tinned fish, cheese or fresh bread. Fine in normal amounts.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

13g

Medium

Saturates

Low

Sugars

1.30g

Low

Salt

1.30g

Medium

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Veggie cocktail sausages
5036829755208 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Open Food Facts last changed this record on 27 March 2026, and our copy is from 20 August 2026. The source is checked every night, and a product is rewritten here only when its record there changes. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search