No photo

Coarse Bombay Mix

Name: Coarse Bombay Mix
Brand: Queenswood Natural Foods

Queenswood Natural Foods

5025627003017

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Fat per 100g

35g

High

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5025627003024, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

NOODLES (GRAM FLOUR, MAIZE FLOUR, RAPSEED OIL, POTATO STARCH, SALT, CHILLIES. CARAWAY SEEDS, RAISING AGENT:SODIUM BICARBONATE LENTILS, PEANUTS, CHICK PEAS, SPICES. MAY CONTAIN GLUTEN, SOYA, SULPHUR, MILK,NUTS, PEANUTS AND SESAME. MAY CONTAIN SMALL PIECES OF SHELL. ENERGY TYPICAL

Processing level

No processing group recorded for this product. That is a gap in the source data rather than a sign the product is unprocessed.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

35g

High

Saturates

Medium

Sugars

Low

Salt

2.07g

High

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

coarse bombay mix
5025627003024 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search