Nippers Sour Candy Crunch

Unknown brand

5011061127259

Processing

Ultra-processed

Group 4 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

None we have assessed

4 of them not yet assessed here

Nutrients

–

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives (4)

This label lists 1 acidity regulator, 1 colour, 1 glazing agent and 1 thickener or gelling agent.

Also on the label, not assessed here yet

E133 Brilliant blue FCF colour
E296 Malic acid acidity regulator
E414 Acacia gum (gum arabic) thickener
E903 Carnauba wax glazing agent

Names and jobs come from the register of additives permitted in Great Britain, which we have not finished transcribing: a code shown without a name is a gap in our coverage, not a finding that it is unapproved. Naming one is not grading it either. Full detail appears only where we have an assessment against a named authority, so all of this describes our coverage rather than these additives. Most are common and low concern.

Ingredients

DEXTROSE, SUGAR, ACID MALIC ACID, FLAVOURINGS, GLUCOSE GUM ARABIC, MODIFIED STARCH COLOURS: E133; BLACK CARROT CONCENTRATE, GLAZING T: CARNAUBA WAX FR BONBONS DEXTROSE. INGREDIENTS: DEXTROSE, SUCRE FIANTS: ACIDE MALIQUE, AROMES, SIROP DE GLUCOSE, GOMME ARABIQUE, AMIDON MODIFIE RANTS: E133; CONCENTRE DE CAROTTE NOIRE, AGENTS D'ENROBAGE E903

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Processing level

NOVA group 4: Ultra-processed

Industrial formulations with additives, isolates and ingredients you would not cook with at home. The strongest modern evidence links high intake of these to poorer health outcomes.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

–

No data

Saturates

–

No data

Sugars

–

No data

Salt

–

No data

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search