Garlic and Herb King Prawns

Name: Garlic and Herb King Prawns
Brand: Morrisons

Morrisons

5010525158358

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Salt per 100g

1.16g

Medium

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

371 Serving suggestion Morrisons Since 1899 GARLIC & HERB KING PRAWNS Cooks from frozen NEW 200g e No artificial colours of flavours A1/2 pack (approx. 77g) (as consumed) provides ENERGY Fat Saturates Sugars Sa 284k 1.3g 0.5g 0.6g 0.89g

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Processing level

No processing group recorded for this product. That is a gap in the source data rather than a sign the product is unprocessed.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

0.70g

Low

Saturates

0.70g

Low

Sugars

0.80g

Low

Salt

1.16g

Medium

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Garlic And Herb King Prawns
5010525249209 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search