cones

Unknown brand

5010482394004

Processing

4

Ultra-processed

Group 4 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

6

0 we grade moderate or higher

3 of them not yet assessed here

Nutrients

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

This label lists 2 colours, 2 emulsifiers and 2 thickeners and gelling agents.

E471 Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids
Emulsifier
Low limited evidence

What it is. Fat derived emulsifiers, closely related to ordinary dietary fats.

Why it is used. One of the most used additives in food: bread, margarine, ice cream, cakes and sauces.

What the evidence says. The body handles these much as it handles other fats, and EFSA's re-evaluation raised no safety concern at the levels used. They sit in the same broad emulsifier and gut microbiome research question as the others, which remains unsettled.

Regulatory status UK Permitted EU Permitted US Permitted

Permitted without a numerical limit. The fat source is not always stated, which matters for some diets rather than for safety.

Assessed against EFSA. Full entry for E471

E160A Carotenes
Yellow to orange colour
No real concern strong evidence

What it is. The orange pigments found in carrots and other vegetables, either extracted or made synthetically.

Why it is used. Colours margarine, soft drinks, dairy, and sweets.

What the evidence says. The same compound the body turns into vitamin A, and safe at the levels used in food. High dose beta-carotene supplements have been linked to harm in smokers, but those doses are far above anything a colour in food delivers, and conflating the two is a common mistake.

Regulatory status UK Permitted EU Permitted US Permitted

Permitted. The supplement findings apply to concentrated doses, not to food colouring.

Assessed against EFSA, JECFA. Full entry for E160A

E322 Lecithin
Emulsifier
No real concern strong evidence

What it is. A natural emulsifier, usually from soya or sunflower.

Why it is used. Keeps chocolate smooth and stops ingredients separating.

What the evidence says. Safe and widely used. Only relevant if the source, such as soya, is an allergen for you.

Regulatory status UK Permitted EU Permitted US Permitted

Permitted freely. Source allergen must be declared.

Assessed against EFSA, JECFA. Full entry for E322

Also on the label, not assessed here yet

  • E150A Plain caramel colour
  • E410 Locust bean gum thickener
  • E412 Guar gum thickener

Names and jobs come from the register of additives permitted in Great Britain, which we have not finished transcribing: a code shown without a name is a gap in our coverage, not a finding that it is unapproved. Naming one is not grading it either. Full detail appears only where we have an assessment against a named authority, so all of this describes our coverage rather than these additives. Most are common and low concern.

Water, Glucose Syrup, Sugar, Wheat Flour, Milk Chocolate Finger (9%) (Sugar, Dried Whole Milk, Cocoa Butter, Sweet Whey Powder (Milk), Cocoa Mass, Fat Reduced Cocoa Powder, Emulsifier: Lecithins), Reconstituted Dried Skimmed Milk, Coconut Oil, Vegetarian Whey Powder (Milk), Vegetable Oils, (Coconut Oil, Sunflower Oil) In Varying Proportions, Milk Chocolate Curls (2%) (Sugar, Dried Whole Milk, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Sweet Whey Powder (Milk), Emulsifier: Lecithins), Emulsifiers: Mono - and Diglycerides of Fatty Acids, Lecithins; Fat Reduced Cocoa Powder, Stabilisers: Guar Gum, Locust Bean Gum; Sugar Cane Fibre, Salt, Colours: Carotenes, Plain Caramel; Flavouring. ALLERGY ADVICE:

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Scan another barcode Search