Aqua Libra Sparkling Water

Name: Aqua Libra Sparkling Water
Brand: Aqua Libra

Aqua Libra

5010102347922

Processing

Unprocessed or minimally processed

Group 1 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Nutrients

–

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 5010102348011, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

Sparkling Water, Lemon Juice from Concentrate, Natural Blood Orange Flavouring with other Natural Flavourings.

Processing level

NOVA group 1: Unprocessed or minimally processed

Whole or barely altered foods. The bulk of a healthy diet is meant to sit here.

Nutrients per 100ml

Fat

Low

Saturates

–

No data

Sugars

–

No data

Salt

–

No data

Judged on the UK FSA thresholds for drinks, which are stricter than the ones for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Aqua Libra Sparkling Water
5010102348011 NOVA 1

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search