wholemeal rolls

Name: wholemeal rolls
Brand: Village Bakery

Village Bakery

4088600418650

Processing

Unprocessed or minimally processed

Group 1 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Salt per 100g

0.82g

Medium

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

ALLERGY ADVICE: For allergens, see ingredients in bold. May also contain oats and rye. DIETARY ADVICE: Suitable for vegetarians. NUTRITION TYPICAL VALUES

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Processing level

NOVA group 1: Unprocessed or minimally processed

Whole or barely altered foods. The bulk of a healthy diet is meant to sit here.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

2.80g

Low

Saturates

0.70g

Low

Sugars

4.40g

Low

Salt

0.82g

Medium

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Wholemeal rolls
4088600417714 no processing data

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search