Set Honey

Name: Set Honey
Brand: Aldi

Aldi

4088600382173

Processing

Processed culinary ingredients

Group 2 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Sugars per 100g

76g

High

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

No ingredients list against this barcode. Another pack of the same product, 4088600021744, lists what follows. It is a different pack, so read it as a guide to the recipe and not as this pack's own label.

set honey, a blend of non-eu honeys nutrition this jar contains approx, 30tablespoon senings per 100g pertablespoon %ri typical values (15g) 1371k/

Processing level

NOVA group 2: Processed culinary ingredients

Things like oils, butter, sugar and salt, used to prepare and season food rather than eaten alone.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

0.50g

Low

Saturates

0.10g

Low

Sugars

76g

High

Salt

–

No data

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Other packs of this product

Open Food Facts keeps a record for every barcode, so one product can appear several times. Each of these carries its own data, and may be fuller or thinner than this one.

Set honey
4088600021744 no processing data
Set Honey
4088600234311 NOVA 2

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search