Cones MINT&CHOCOLATE

giannis

4088600096155

Processing

4

Ultra-processed

Group 4 of 4 on the NOVA scale

Additives listed

5

0 we grade moderate or higher

3 of them not yet assessed here

Sugars per 100g

25g

High

UK FSA front of pack threshold

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

This label lists 3 thickeners and gelling agents and 2 emulsifiers.

E471 Mono- and diglycerides of fatty acids
Emulsifier
Low limited evidence

What it is. Fat derived emulsifiers, closely related to ordinary dietary fats.

Why it is used. One of the most used additives in food: bread, margarine, ice cream, cakes and sauces.

What the evidence says. The body handles these much as it handles other fats, and EFSA's re-evaluation raised no safety concern at the levels used. They sit in the same broad emulsifier and gut microbiome research question as the others, which remains unsettled.

Regulatory status UK Permitted EU Permitted US Permitted

Permitted without a numerical limit. The fat source is not always stated, which matters for some diets rather than for safety.

Assessed against EFSA. Full entry for E471

E322 Lecithin
Emulsifier
No real concern strong evidence

What it is. A natural emulsifier, usually from soya or sunflower.

Why it is used. Keeps chocolate smooth and stops ingredients separating.

What the evidence says. Safe and widely used. Only relevant if the source, such as soya, is an allergen for you.

Regulatory status UK Permitted EU Permitted US Permitted

Permitted freely. Source allergen must be declared.

Assessed against EFSA, JECFA. Full entry for E322

Also on the label, not assessed here yet

  • E410 Locust bean gum thickener
  • E412 Guar gum thickener
  • E440 Pectin thickener

Names and jobs come from the register of additives permitted in Great Britain, which we have not finished transcribing: a code shown without a name is a gap in our coverage, not a finding that it is unapproved. Naming one is not grading it either. Full detail appears only where we have an assessment against a named authority, so all of this describes our coverage rather than these additives. Most are common and low concern.

[partially reconstituted skimmed milk concentrate, sugar, glucose syrup, coconut oi, whey powder (milk), invert sugar syrup, emulsifier, mono-and diglycerides of fatty acids, stabilisers: locust bean gum, guar gum, plant extracts (safflower concentrate, spinulina extrac), sucose syrup, flavouring, acdity regulator , itricacid, white mint flavoured lce cream partaly reconstituted skimmed milk concentrate, sugar, glucose syrup, coconut oi, whey powder (milk, emulsifier, mono-and diglycerides of fattyaids, stabilisers: locust bean gum, guar gum, flavouring, biscuit cone [wheat flour sugar, coconut oi, emulsifier, lecithins (soya), chocolate sauce (16%) [glucose syrup, water, sugar, fat reduced cocoa powder', coca mass, sweetened condensed skimmed mik (skimmed milk, sugar), gelling agent: pectin, salt), chocolate flavoured coating (vegetabe ois (coconut oi,sunflower oi), sugar,fat educed coca powder, emulsfier, lecthins (soya), mint flavoured chocolate pieces (2,59%) (dark chocolte (sugar, coca mass',cocoa butter',emulsfier lecithins (soya), sugar, gaze (water, gazng agent gum arabic sugar, honey), peppemint oi),

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Scan another barcode Search