Chargrilled British Chicken Slices

Name: Chargrilled British Chicken Slices
Brand: M&S

M&S

29450633

Processing

–

Not recorded

A gap in the source, not a sign it is unprocessed

Additives listed

None we have assessed

Counted from the label, not by quantity

Nutrients

–

Nothing above the low band

Or no figures recorded at all

Three separate readings, kept apart on purpose. This is not a score, and none of it says this product is harmful.

Additives

No additives listed in the source data for this product. That can mean it genuinely has none, or that the entry is incomplete. The pack itself is the authority.

Ingredients

Chicken Breast (97%) - Lemon Juice Sea Salt Chicken Stock eat Deliciously healthy food Best enjoyed as part of a healthy well Lifestyle & a balanced varied det Protein contributes to the maintenance of muscle mass Made in the UK with M&S assured chicken from farms in the UK SC5015 © M&S plc PO Box 3339 CH99 9QS UK M&S (Ireland) Ltd TRAY B Do y PO Box 13022 Dublin 2 Ireland 160g e SQ11 M 2945 0633

As printed on the pack, in the producer's own order: ingredients are listed by weight, so what comes first is most of what is in it. E numbers link to their assessment where we have one.

Processing level

No processing group recorded for this product. That is a gap in the source data rather than a sign the product is unprocessed.

Nutrients per 100g

Fat

2.10g

Low

Saturates

0.56g

Low

Sugars

Low

Salt

0.14g

Low

These figures are estimated from the ingredients rather than read off the packaging, so treat the bands as approximate. The pack is the authority.

Judged on the UK FSA front of pack thresholds for solid foods. A dash means the source has no figure, which is not the same as a low one.

Where this came from

Product data from Open Food Facts, which is crowd sourced and can be incomplete or out of date. Photograph from the same source, under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike licence. Our copy is from 17 August 2026: Open Food Facts is checked every night, and a product is rewritten only when its record there has changed, so an older date means the source has not moved rather than that we stopped looking. Something wrong? Correcting it at the source fixes it here and everywhere else that uses the same data. If the problem is one of our additive assessments, tell us.

Scan another barcode Search